dmv.community is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A small regional Mastodon instance for those in the DC, Maryland, and Virginia areas. Local news, commentary, and conversation.

Administered by:

Server stats:

172
active users

#praxis

2 posts2 participants0 posts today

#praxis #resist #antifa #ancom #solidarity #solarpunk

There's a lot of excellent #advice going around about how to start getting involved in #DirectAction. I'm also thinking about how to keep the #momentum going once we've started, and #build upon what we're doing.

If you've read a #radical book, you can summarize it in a more #accessible format like a #zine, and share what you learned.

If you've planted a #VictoryGarden, you can share what you've grown with your #local #MutualAid network.

#Neuhier – Hallo Mastodon! 👋
(english Version below)

Ich freue mich, hier dabei zu sein! 🙌

🔹 Wer bin ich?
Ich bin #Wissenschaftlerin aus dem Bereich der #Wirtschaftspsychologie und #Wirtschaftsinformatik und beschäftige mich intensiv mit #Transformationen und damit zusammenhängende Aspekte wie #Agilität, #Führung und #Digitalisierung / #KI – insbesondere mit der Frage, wie dieses ominöse agile #Mindset entsteht und welche Faktoren es beeinflussen.

🔹 Was könnt ihr hier erwarten?
✨ Einblicke in die #Forschung, #Praxis und #Lehre rund um Menschen bei der Arbeit
✨ Diskussionen und Austausch zu Agilität, #Scrum, #KI (in der #Lehre), #PsychologischeSicherheit, Führung, und Mindset

Ich freue mich auf spannende Gespräche und neue Perspektiven! 🚀

Mit wem sollte ich mich dazu unbedingt vernetzen? Ich freue mich über Eure Vorschläge und Ideen! 😊

Danke an @derralf, der mir geholfen hat, endlich einen jetzt "aktiven" Anfang in Mastodon zu wagen 🙏

---------------------------------------

#NewHere – Hello Mastodon! 👋

Excited to be here! 🙌

🔹 Who am I?
I’m a researcher in the fields of business psychology and business informatics, deeply engaged in transformation topics, including agility, leadership, and digitalization/AI. My main focus: How does this elusive agile mindset emerge, and what factors influence it?

🔹 What can you expect here?
✨ Insights into #research, practice, and #teaching, about people at work
✨ Discussions and exchanges on #agility, #scrum, #AI (in #education) #psychologicalsafety, #leadership and #mindset

Looking forward to exciting conversations and new perspectives! 🚀

Who should I definitely connect with on these topics? I’d love to hear your suggestions and ideas! 😊

Big thanks to @derralf for helping me finally take the leap and become active on Mastodon! 🙏

Podcast: PolL049 – Der Anarchismus. Idee – Praxis – Lebensform mit Prof. Fabian Lemmes


In dieser Folge ist Prof. Fabian Lemmes vom Lehrstuhl für Medien und Kulturgeschichte zu Gast, der uns in die Geschichte des Anarchismus einführt. Dabei gehen wir einigen falschen Vorstellungen auf den Grund – aber auch den Auswirkungen dieser politischen „Lebensform“. Wussten Sie zum Beispiel, was die Grünen mit Anarchismus zu tun haben?

Audio: Web | MP3 (44:18)

#Podcast #Anarchismus #Idee #Praxis #Lebensform #Fabian-Lemmes #2024-01-15 #2025-02-01

00:00/44:18
Continued thread

philosophers are like a buffet - more questionable dishes 🧵 2/?

(worked hard on this, be kind)

Zeno of Citium invented Stoicism, the philosophy of accepting whatever daddy capitalism does to you with a smile. basically philosophical BDSM without the fun parts or aftercare. the ultimate submissive's guide to letting the world raw dog you while pretending you wanted it that way. also made the unforgivable sin of spawning generations of tech bros quoting Marcus Aurelius while building surveillance capitalism and calling their emotional constipation "virtue." bonus points for inspiring LinkedIn philosophers who think "the obstacle is the way" means exploiting their workers harder

Schopenhauer grasped the fundamental nature of suffering while being its perfect embodiment. wrote an entire philosophy around being an incel, yet his insights on will and representation resonate perfectly in those dark 3am moments of clarity

Kierkegaard understood existential dread so well because he lived it. spent his life wrestling with faith, anxiety, and regret over a broken engagement. brilliant on paper, but perhaps needed less contemplation and more touching grass

de Beauvoir revolutionized feminist philosophy while trapped in philosophy's most toxic relationship. wrote about women's liberation and authenticity while letting a narcissistic existentialist control her narrative. the irony burns

Kropotkin watched ants share food and decided humans could do better. noble idea, but maybe spent too much time with cooperative insects and not enough time watching people fight over parking spots. still, his analysis of mutual aid shaped revolutionary thought

Hegel constructed an entire philosophical system to explain everything, then explained it in the most convoluted way possible. thesis: brilliant insights, antithesis: impenetrable prose, synthesis: philosophical migraine

Jung mapped the collective unconscious then got so lost in it he built a tower and invented languages. went from analyzing archetypes to living them, which is either madness or transcendence. possibly both

Wittgenstein solved all of philosophy's problems twice, declared philosophy meaningless both times, yet couldn't stop philosophizing. threw away wealth to teach children, then got frustrated when they didn't understand logical positivism

Baudrillard predicted our descent into hyperreality while becoming increasingly unreal himself. wrote about the death of reality while reality died around him. simultaneously predicted social media brain rot but didn't go far enough

Epicurus preached pleasure as the highest good but defined it as "not being disturbed." founded a philosophy of hedonism that mainly involved eating simple meals and having lengthy discussions about atoms. task failed successfully

Zinn rewrote history from below while academia clutched its pearls. showed us the people's story but thought education alone could overcome power. he gave us the tools to understand why we need to burn it all down. READ PEOPLE'S HISTORY

give me Emma Goldman - she knew theory meant nothing without dancing with a molotov in one hand and a lover in the other

update: now a thread! 🧵 1/?

philosophers are like a buffet - take what's useful, leave what's not

Marx, so much to say here:
- he saw the chains clearly but didn't realize how many would learn to love their shackles
- understood class consciousness but couldn't predict how effectively spectacle would fragment it
- mapped capital's structure perfectly but missed how it would mutate to survive

Camus gets it - life's absurd, might as well embrace it and find joy in the revolt

Zizek's fun but needs *sniff* to get to the fucking point *sniff* faster *sniff*

Nietzsche understood the death of god but his übermensch concept got hijacked by fascist dipshits who couldn't read. and don't even get me started on either: the gross misreading of what he actually believed about nihilism and the antisemitic shit added after death

Stirner needed to learn to shitpost - imagine writing a whole book about rejecting social constructs and then getting mad when people don't take your social construct (egoism) seriously enough

LaVey got the hedonism right but was too caught up in Randian bullshit to see the bigger picture

Spinoza knew what was up with determinism but needed to loosen his collar a bit

Bataille understood the connection between sex, death, and the sacred - my kind of freak

Deleuze got that desire is revolutionary but wrote like he was being paid by the syllable

Rawls is too optimistic about human nature but his veil of ignorance is a useful thought experiment

Foucault nailed power dynamics but missed some practical applications

Sartre had good ideas but was kind of a dick about them

Butler understood gender as performance but academia made it too complex for the masses who needed to hear it

but honestly? give me Diogenes any day - that's praxis you can use... nothing says 'fuck your system' like jerking off in public and living in a barrel

or maybe i'm just a silly chaos witch who likes to fuck with people's expectations. could be both. probably is both.

Really great new Podcast on Enshitification – Cory Doctorow @pluralistic

Enshittification isn’t caused by venture capital

Episode webpage: craphound.com/overclocked/2025

Media file: archive.org/download/Cory_Doct

Important thoughts on Bluesky and importance of constraints.

Impressive list of upcoming events Cory. Glad to see it.

craphound.comEnshittification isn’t caused by venture capital | Cory Doctorow's craphound.com

Pause in der #Praxis und man plaudert über Gott und die Welt.

Eine junge Angestellte die wir aus ihrer Ausbildung übernommen haben berichtete von ihrem gestrigen Besuch bei ihrer #Bank .
Sie hat ein wenig Geld gespart, bekam schon mal etwas von ihren verstorbenen Großeltern und wollte von ihrem Sachbearbeiter nun einen Plan haben wie man am besten Geld anlegt und spart.
Das Gespräch muss wohl informativ gewesen sein und der Mitarbeiter verabschiedete sie dann mit den Worten:
"Sie könne ja heute Abend mal mit ihrem Mann darüber reden".

Mein Vormittag war schon einigermaßen scheiße, diese Geschichte schaltete mich leider auf "Go".
Ich habe mich umgezogen und bin zu dieser Bank gefahren.
Ich bin nicht schrill wenn ich richtig sauer bin. Ich bin auch nicht "hysterisch" wenn ich richtig sauer bin. Ich plappere auch nicht wenn ich richtig sauer bin.
Ich bin ruhig aber man kann mich sehr deutlich hören.
Ich bin mit dem Mitarbeiter und seinem Filialstellenleiter etwas entgleist - rote Haare.

War das drüber? Ja.
Tut es mir leid? Nein.

Hot take: The Left is too "singles issue", what do I mean by this? I mean that we as leftists have the tendency to hyper focus on singular issues instead of a systemic approach to change. We saw Kamala Harris lose the election likely due to the massacre in Gaza which she refused to condemn and the Left's subsequent boycott of her: middleeasteye.net/opinion/us-t
And I'm not saying not to pressure your politicians, I'm saying that it's important to look at the big picture, as long as we'll have the horrible system of corporate democracy we'll have to choose between terrible candidates. This year demonstrates how stupid the decision to boycott Kamala in 2024 was, not only is Trump offering to aid Israel perpetuate its massacre with direct American troop involvement but he's stating his will to invade US allies such as Canada, Greenland, Panama and he even said that Turkey should get to decide the fate of Syria, likely meaning the death of Rojava. If Trump's policies will be implemented and this isn't some elaborate bluff or one of his many lies the world will pay for the one track mind of the American Left.

Middle East EyeTrump did not win this election. Harris was defeated by a Gaza-inspired boycottThe Republican candidate's victory over Kamala Harris wasn't due to his surge in popularity but a conscious choice by millions to boycott the vote over the Democrat-backed genocide