The article points out that UBI will boost local economies because low-income households will spend additional income immediately, stimulating demand, but I think there's another very significant boost: freeing potential entrepreneurs to risk start-up.
I worked in business development for many years, and it was clear that many people with great ideas and abilities - including people disabled in other ways - just couldn't take the risk of losing their current income. Not only is this a huge loss for local economic development - it is unjust and inequitable, because of course the already wealthy are not held back by the risks.
How many of these #UBI experiments do we need until we believe that UBI does, in fact, improve the human condition, and does not actually turn people into bums? https://infosec.exchange/@codinghorror/114333889015062301
@brenttoderian.bsky.social #UBI has a proven track record. There is absolutely no reason why Canada should have the high level of homelessness we do. #PMMC, it’s time to end homelessness. We know #PeePee would prefer to jail these #LazyBums, as he would call these people who have fallen on hard luck times, because the #Cons don’t believe in helping society. They label the homeless as useless, addicts, criminals, etc. The only Cdns that #Conservatives care about, are themselves
@brenttoderian.bsky.social #UBI has a proven track record. There is absolutely no reason why Canada should have the high level of homelessness we do. #PMMC, it’s time to end homelessness. We know #PeePee would prefer to jail these #LazyBums, as he would call these people who have fallen on hard luck times, because the #Cons don’t believe in helping society. They would label the homeless as useless, addicts, criminals, etc. The Canadians that #Conservatives care about, is themselves
If we in the #USA manage to get our country back from the current #dictatorship, and we still think government is a good idea (I'm not trying to resolve the question of #anarchism right now), we need to recognize first of all that we can't go back to the prior status quo. Certain core aspects of that system got us into this mess, and will require fundamental change.
(1) Our #voting system needs overhaul. The right to vote needs to be recognized explicitly as a RIGHT, not a privilege for each state to regulate largely as it pleases. In particular, no criminal conviction should ever be able to impair the right to vote; racist abuse of the criminal law has been used to accomplish widespread disenfranchisement of minorities. Also, we need to recognize that winner-take-all voting systems are utterly incompatible with genuine democracy. If you ever have to ask whether you can afford to vote for who you really want, as opposed to voting for the lesser evil, you do not live in a democracy. Something like proportional representation, ranked-choice voting, or instant-runoff voting is not a luxury; some such system is a minimum requirement for authentic democracy.
(2) To hell with "#SeparationOfPowers". Any protection it supposedly offered us has been purely illusory. Indeed, it was never intended to safeguard the people. It was designed by an elite who deeply distrusted the people, in order to safeguard their wealth and power FROM the people. A legislature answerable to the people is the best safeguard for their rights that any government can hope to offer. Autonomy for the judicial and executive functions of government, as separate "branches" outside the control of the legislature, has brought nothing good. Throughout most of its history, an autonomous Supreme Court has consistently defended the most depraved policies of private power against legislative efforts to control them; and now it has aided and abetted the autonomous Presidency in fulfilling its inherent tendency to degenerate into a #dictatorship. Put the courts and all executive functions under full legislative control, to be granted only such limited and conditional autonomy as the legislature sees fit to offer them.
(3) We will need to overhaul our understanding of what the right of #FreeSpeech consists in. I do not like the unclear slogan "money is not speech"; but the right of INDIVIDUALS to speak freely is what must be safeguarded, and if that is to be accomplished, we cannot allow private capital to monopolize control over the media of communication, much less recognize an inviolable right for private capital to buy such control. Also, we may need to place severe restrictions — as #Germany has done — on organized promotion of certain ideas that involve a systematic attempt to suppress the very existence, let alone the free expression, of others. A #fascist march has more in common with a brandished weapon than with a discussion of fascist ideas in, say, a university classroom or a private home.
These changes (1)–(3) will not, of course, be sufficient by themselves. I have not addressed issues as fundamental as who will own the means of #production, whether people should be guaranteed an unconditional #BasicIncome (#UBI), or how (and whether) #policing should be done. But (1)–(3) will still be needed, no matter how a host of other basic questions are to be resolved.
I’m always peeved when headline writers accept and promote conservative framing:
“The effect on their work ethic was surprising”
No, it wasn’t. It was exactly as expected, based on multiple other studies done over decades. The only reason another ‘expectation’ exists is because conservatives have been loudly bleating the *completely unsupported* supposed dangers *without evidence* every chance they get.
It’s past time to reverse that expectation.
Because people would rather work than sit around with nothing to do and get depressed or be homeless.
I can tell you this, as a retired person, having a job gives you incentive to get up and do something. Improves your health too.
If you are retired, you want to find a 'job' even if you are doing it for free[dom].
@Sanderde #UBI has a proven track record of success. #MapleMAGA would have us believe that criminals should be locked up for life with no hope for redemption, residential school victims should learn to get a work ethic and stop complaining, females should pay attention to the ticking of their biological clocks…. This is the #ConservativeCommonSense. A govt that helps citizens, welcomes immigrants, and seeks to end homelessness, meh, the #cons don’t like things like that.
Germany's 'Universal Basic Income' Experiment Proves It Doesn't Encourage Unmployment #UBI
https://yro.slashdot.org/story/25/04/12/0351222/germanys-universal-basic-income-experiment-proves-it-doesnt-encourage-unmployment
“If people had more money, they would have less incentive to work,” say rich financiers, lawyers and CEOs who still work 80-hour weeks.
#UBI #LivingWage
@Lara I also like the idea of #UBI, specially for picking up those who earn less. But since these are finite pilots, people are probably not going to leave their jobs, knowing that later will have to go searching for one. These results should be taken with a grain of salt.
OTOH once I asked a coworker opposed to the idea what would she do if she didn't have to work as in customer support to pay rent and eat and she left the conversation by saying "surely something else".
Another successful Universal Basic Income study. There was no drop in productiveness "On average, study participants worked 40 hours a week and stayed in employment" “We find no evidence that people love doing nothing,” instead "their lives were “more valuable and meaningful” and felt a clear improvement in their mental health" since poverty is on purpose to keep us feeling stressed and beaten so we don't fight back #1984book
Good news for #UBI
"One concern voiced by critics is that receiving a basic income could make people less inclined to work. But the #Grundeinkommen study suggests that may not be the case at all. It found that receiving a basic income was not a reason for people to quit their jobs. On average, study participants worked 40 hours a week and stayed in #employment – identical to the study’s control group, which received no payment"