Sharon A. Hill<p><strong>Pop Cryptid Spectator 1</strong></p><p>In this edition:</p><ul><li>What’s up with this project</li><li>Pop Goes the Cryptid explainer</li><li>r/cryptid aims to be inclusive</li><li>New cryptid media </li><li>Texas’ Chupacabra coaster</li><li>Cryptozoology.com shuttered</li></ul><p>Hello! Welcome to the first edition of the Pop Cryptid Spectator, my regular (hopefully) posting of observations and commentary on my current favorite personal project – watching the parade of “cryptids” in popular culture. </p><p>I recently recalled that when I was a kid, like 9 years old, I used to collect interesting things about whatever I was interested in at the time and send to my friends or just pretend to be running a newspaper. Here I am, still doing that decades later. It seems to be what I do.</p><p>My intent with this regular posting is, roughly:</p><ul><li>To highlight the fun ways legendary or dubious animals are showing up in modern media. </li><li>To explore the expansion of cryptozoology from what was originally framed as a “science-based” endeavor to what is now a mass cultural phenomenon – a profusion of strange entities that are labeled “cryptids”.</li><li>And, to share interesting news bits I find related to “hidden” or legendary creatures.</li></ul><p>If you are looking for me to criticize Bigfoot believers, or to make fun of Hodag hunters, there will be none of that. I would suggest that might a.) lighten up because this is not a highly serious subject and, b.) stick around to just enjoy it, because the cryptid scene is crazy right now. It’s so diverse, creative, and complicated. It’s so much more than monster hunting or extinction guilt. Cryptids are a way to express personal and regional identity, attract tourism, inspire art, examine history, explore spiritual ideas, represent liminality and a sense of the “other”. I could go on and on. There is a lot to say. So I’m going to get started.</p><p>But, I feel I have to backtrack just a bit first. </p><p><strong>Pop Goes the Cryptid</strong></p><p>I put out an explainer presentation called Pop Goes the Cryptid a little while ago as part of the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2CZMfyHQAM" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Virtual Folk Zoology conference</a> hosted by researcher and data scientist, Floe Foxon. Check it out if you haven’t already. I reworked the presentation a little bit and put it up on <a href="https://sharonahill.com/pop-goes-the-cryptid-explained/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">my website</a>, as well as re-recording it <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa7daq1cxSM" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">into a video</a> for people who prefer that. The reaction has been interesting. I received comments by some respected colleagues that highlighted some hot button issues in the cryptozoo. My <a href="https://sharonahill.com/arguing-over-the-science-of-mystery-animals/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">subsequent post noting these issues</a> just fanned the flames. In short – there is a bifurcated view of the world of cryptozoology in more than one way. And each side can be broken into additional factions. It’s messy. The two opposing camps argue a lot.</p><p>First, there is the division between those with a scientific view of cryptozoology and those who embrace the paranormal and supernatural. Now, that is grossly oversimplifying it. I’ll may try to address that at some later time but I think you get the general idea.</p><p>There is also a more nuanced break between those who wish cryptozoology would return to a more scientific framework and those who say it never was scientific and might never be. And, that’s also is an oversimplification. You can take a look at <a href="https://sharonahill.com/arguing-over-the-science-of-mystery-animals/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">my recent writings</a> for more explanation on that dispute.</p><p>And, there is the evergreen argument about what does or doesn’t fit under the label of “cryptid”? What’s the definition? How should the word be used? The reasons for the bickering about labels and boundaries is very much under the umbrella of my Pop Cryptid framing. However, I’ll attempt to be neutral in this forum. </p><p><strong>Alternative naming</strong></p><p>Venturing into the latest goings-on, I begin with a specific dispute regarding the inclusion of two popular “cryptids”. The moderator of the cryptid subreddit has broached the sensitive topic of the use of two entity names that represent Native spiritual creatures. I’ll say them once, with apologies, to clarify. It is common to see Skinwalker and Wendigo referred to as “cryptids” in the broadest sense of being secretive or hidden creatures of dubious existence. They are in no way zoological animals to be named and collected, which is why many on the subreddit don’t think they should be mentioned at all. However, they are both extremely popular in media. The “what is a cryptid” question remains the core of contention. For now, the moderator is asking contributors to come up with alternative names for these two beings. The ’S’ word has already been substituted with options “flesh gait”, “flesh pedestrian” (which is objectively stupid) and “pale crawler” based on modern storytelling, not indigenous lore. The W creature doesn’t seem to have a ready substitution, and the floor is open to suggestions. If you are familiar with the legend of the cannibal monster with a heart of ice, you probably noticed how the modern depictions play fast and loose with the lore.</p><p>And they will continue to change because they are not physical things able to captured and measured, they can morph into whatever we need them to be. </p><p><strong>New cryptid media</strong></p><p>The venerable Adrian Shine has a new book out on sea creatures titled <em>A Natural History of Sea Serpents</em>. You certainly know him – he’s the exceptionally bearded scholar of Loch Ness legends. The book was out in the UK in October and is now available in US markets and looks like a worthy volume.</p> <p>Jenna Ortega and Paul Rudd are starring in a very bizarre-looking film featuring life-saving and life-threatening unicorns. In a setup that reminds me of Harry and the Henderson’s, they have a vehicular encounter with the magical creature. <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt28443655/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Death of a Unicorn</a> is set to be released in the next few months. </p><p>Once again, we see how the line between cryptid and not-a-cryptid is more porous than a bad email spam filter. The title unicorn is labeled in at least in some media outlets as a cryptid even though it historically was not seen as such. However, in this case, it seems to literally be one.</p><p>Six Flags Fiesta Texas amusement park in San Antonio announced that it’s changing the branding of its Goliath roller coaster into that of the Chupacabra. The <a href="https://www.mysanantonio.com/business/article/six-flags-fiesta-texas-new-ride-19993114.phpchupa" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">news release</a> for the transformation includes mention of the chupa as a “Texas folklore legend”. Indeed! I was interested to see which version of the chupacabra they picked – the spiky alien kangaroo or the mangy vampire dog. Turns out they combined them both and added additional parts, embracing the chupacabra tradition of being a cultural shape-shifter representing any weird thing that looks scary. </p> <p><strong>Loss of an OG cryptid website</strong></p><p>WordPress sent me a notice that I’ve been blogging for 18 years on that platform. But 25 years ago, there was cryptozoology.com. The site was registered in 1998, before some of you were even aware that the subject, or the internet, even existed. The site had articles about lots of popular creatures and stuck mostly to the zoological framing, as much as I can remember. I hadn’t visited in a while but, when looking for other cryptid forums online, I checked in. And it was gone. Shut down. This happened in (oops) November 2022! The domain name is still registered for the next several years. I have no clue as to what might happen to the site. </p><p>During those 25 years, the scene changed drastically. Most of the content on cryptids has shifted to Cryptid Wiki which includes more modern media and depiction of many new creatures that seem to appear or resurface from the past on a weekly basis. </p><p>Will the original .com site return all new and shiny? If it doesn’t, what a lost opportunity. However, the loss of this place on the web feeds into the Pop Cryptid trend very neatly. People don’t do an internet search for the word “cryptozoology” like they do for “cryptids”. The zoology part, while still guarded by the stalwart old-school gatekeepers, is completely overrun by the pop cryptid scene all over the web that deals in folk horror, AI and game-based creatures, cosplayers, DeviantArtists, and pokecryptids. Although a bit sad, it seems appropriate that cryptozoology.com would fade away at this time as a symbol of how things used to be.</p><p>For more on this trend from cryptozoology to cryptids, check out my post called <a href="https://moderncryptozoology.wordpress.com/2022/04/11/cryptid-trends-without-the-zoology/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">“Cryptid” out-trends “cryptozoology”</a>, which includes the Google trends data results comparing the two terms. There is a story being told there. </p><p><strong>Pop Goes the Cryptid Facebook group</strong></p><p>If you are still on Facebook, I have a page where I drop all the links I find to new cryptid content. Read them there first at <a href="https://www.facebook.com/Popcryptids" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">facebook.com/Popcryptids</a> {EDIT: I’m no longer posting to this group. Buh-bye, Meta}</p><p>Here are some recent posts:</p><ul><li>Cryptid dogs subreddit r/cryptiddogs</li><li>A Russian creature called the Witkes that may have been inspired by buried frozen mammoth carcasses</li><li>A cryptid themed holiday bar that popped up in Wilmington, NC</li><li>A cryptid themed band called Beach Creeper. Their surf rock content is creative and cover art is hilarious. Check them out on BandCamp.</li></ul> <p>That’s a wrap for the first Pop Cryptid Spectator. I hope to be back soon to supply new observations from the world of mystery creatures.</p><p>Go to <a href="http://SharonAHill.com" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">SharonAHill.com</a> and click on <a href="https://sharonahill.com/pop-goes-the-cryptid/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Pop goes the Cryptid landing page</a>. While you’re there, make sure you <a href="https://sharonahill.com/subscribe-to-posts/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">subscribe </a>to all the posts – it’s always free and I don’t send annoying spam. </p><p>You can also email me with comments, suggestions or questions at Popcryptid(at)proton.me</p><p>Watch the video version of Pop Cryptid Spectator on my YouTube channel.</p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/Q5MXw_uOd3k" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://youtu.be/Q5MXw_uOd3k</a></p><p>More:</p> <span class="">Pop Cryptid Spectator</span> <a href="https://sharonahill.com/pop-cryptid-spectator-8/" class="" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><span class="">Pop Cryptid Spectator 8</span></a> <p><span class=""></span></p> <p><strong><a class="" href="https://sharonahill.com/pop-cryptid-spectator-8/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Pop Cryptid Spectator 8</a></strong></p> <p></p> <a href="https://sharonahill.com/pop-cryptid-spectator-7/" class="" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><span class="">Pop Cryptid Spectator 7</span></a> <p><span class=""></span></p> <p><strong><a class="" href="https://sharonahill.com/pop-cryptid-spectator-7/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Pop Cryptid Spectator 7</a></strong></p> <p></p> <a href="https://sharonahill.com/pop-cryptid-spectator-issue-6/" class="" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><span class="">Pop Cryptid Spectator Issue 6</span></a> <p><span class=""></span></p> <p><strong><a class="" href="https://sharonahill.com/pop-cryptid-spectator-issue-6/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Pop Cryptid Spectator Issue 6</a></strong></p> <p></p> <a href="https://sharonahill.com/pop-cryptid-spectator-5/" class="" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><span class="">Pop Cryptid Spectator 5</span></a> <p><span class=""></span></p> <p><strong><a class="" href="https://sharonahill.com/pop-cryptid-spectator-5/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Pop Cryptid Spectator 5</a></strong></p> <p></p> <a href="https://sharonahill.com/pop-cryptid-spectator-4/" class="" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><span class="">Pop Cryptid Spectator 4</span></a> <p><span class=""></span></p> <p><strong><a class="" href="https://sharonahill.com/pop-cryptid-spectator-4/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Pop Cryptid Spectator 4</a></strong></p> <p></p> <a href="https://sharonahill.com/pop-cryptid-spectator-3/" class="" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><span class="">Pop Cryptid Spectator 3</span></a> <p><span class=""></span></p> <p><strong><a class="" href="https://sharonahill.com/pop-cryptid-spectator-3/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Pop Cryptid Spectator 3</a></strong></p> <p></p> <a href="https://sharonahill.com/pop-cryptid-spectator-2/" class="" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><span class="">Pop Cryptid Spectator 2</span></a> <p><span class=""></span></p> <p><strong><a class="" href="https://sharonahill.com/pop-cryptid-spectator-2/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Pop Cryptid Spectator 2</a></strong></p> <p></p> <p><a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/1/" target="_blank">#1</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/2/" target="_blank">#2</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/ai-cryptids/" target="_blank">#AICryptids</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/bigfoot/" target="_blank">#Bigfoot</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/bigfoot-hunters-die/" target="_blank">#BigfootHuntersDie</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/cryptid/" target="_blank">#cryptid</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/cryptid-fake/" target="_blank">#cryptidFake</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/cryptid-tv-show/" target="_blank">#cryptidTVShow</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/giant-owls/" target="_blank">#giantOwls</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/godzilla-sighting/" target="_blank">#GodzillaSighting</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/google-earth/" target="_blank">#GoogleEarth</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/hood-cryptids/" target="_blank">#HoodCryptids</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/out-there-crimes-of-the-paranormal/" target="_blank">#OutThereCrimesOfTheParanormal</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/pop-cryptids/" target="_blank">#popCryptids</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/scryptids/" target="_blank">#scryptids</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/skinwalker/" target="_blank">#Skinwalker</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/the-cryptid-factor/" target="_blank">#TheCryptidFactor</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/wendigo/" target="_blank">#Wendigo</a></p><p><a href="https://sharonahill.com/?p=9171" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">sharonahill.com/?p=9171</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p>
Recent searches
No recent searches
Search options
Only available when logged in.
dmv.community is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A small regional Mastodon instance for those in the DC, Maryland, and Virginia areas. Local news, commentary, and conversation.
Administered by:
Server stats:
166active users
dmv.community: About · Status · Profiles directory · Privacy policy
Mastodon: About · Get the app · Keyboard shortcuts · View source code · v4.3.7
#chupacabra
0 posts · 0 participants · 0 posts today
Sharon A. Hill<p><strong>Lost Monster Files – Carolina Chupacabra review</strong></p><p>The Discovery Channel’s new series “Lost Monster Files” (LMF) is promoted as a cryptozoology program that uses a team of experts that consult the archives of “founder of cryptozoology”, Ivan T. Sanderson, in their investigations of modern claims of unclassified animals. The first episode, titled <em><a href="https://go.discovery.com/video/lost-monster-files-discovery-atve-us/carolina-chupacabra" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Carolina Chupacabra</a></em>, aired on 9 October 2024. Here is my review about the content and conclusions.</p><p><strong>Not a promising start</strong></p><p>There is not a lot of reliable background information on this show on the web. There was <a href="https://press.wbd.com/us/media-release/new-series-lost-monster-files-reopens-recently-unearthed-decades-old-archive-famed" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">a press release</a> and that’s about it. The episodes listed in various places are jumbled and they are not yet airing on the usual streaming services (that is, it’s not on <em>Discovery +</em>). Here is the official blurb for the first episode:</p><p><em>In the premiere episode, the group investigates a series of strange livestock mutilations in the Smoky Mountains that locals fear could be tied to the infamous Chupacabra, which has terrorized the Southwest for decades. Using journals and evidence from Sanderson’s archive, the team investigates a rash of deadly encounters in North Carolina to try and document this killer canine…and the possibility that the creature could be migrating east.</em></p><p>Interestingly, I also found this alternate wording on another TV listing site that was more or less the same except for this part:</p><p><em>…the team attempts to uncover the identity of this killer canine and whether or not it could be part of a<strong> secret government testing program</strong>.</em></p><p>Right from the start, with the intro (<em>“A horrifying, blood-sucking beast is terrorizing Appalachia…”</em>), and the hint of conspiracy mongering from what might have been an earlier draft blurb, we’re in outlandish BS paranormal territory. The episode ends up NOT going there, at least, but I can’t help wonder if that was an editing decision. Before we get to the content, let’s check out the show’s “experts.”</p><p><strong>A Team of “Experts”</strong></p><p>From the press release: </p><p><em>The team includes field scientist and tech expert Charlie Mewshaw, cryptozoologist Brittany Barbieri, predator experts and wildlife trackers Troy Lillie and Justin Igualada, and former CIA officer and FBI agent Tracy Walder. Following evidence and theories buried away for decades and chasing up-to-the-minute encounters, they aim to bring fact to fiction by documenting one of these legendary creatures for the first time.</em></p><p>In the intro, we also are told that all of these people are “experts”. Obviously, we are meant to find them credible and experienced in investigating mystery animal claims. Mewshaw says he has several degrees, </p><ul><li>Barbieri is listed as a “cryptozoologist”, and the others are touted for their experience and knowledge. My idea of experts must be different than the producers as <span>none are zoologists or biologists</span>. Barbieri, is known as a paranormal researcher who has interest in UFOlogy. She has given herself the title of cryptozoologist like many others in that field. But her <a href="https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4731065/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">IMDB bio</a> states Actress, Writer and Producer. </li><li><a href="https://charliemewshaw.com/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Charlie Mewshaw</a> is an author, podcaster, and artist (and now “program host”) who cites his “natural resource science” background. It’s unclear what that means but it that is not “biology” or “zoology”.</li><li>Troy Lillie is Brittany’s brother. His job, according to Facebook, is Co-Owner of Crocstar clothing and produces crocodile-related conservation media content.</li><li>Justin Igualada is a wildlife handler and alligator wrestler.</li><li>I don’t doubt that CIA/FBI person Tracy Walder was what she said but it doesn’t actually have any value to a show about mysterious animals unless they are going to focus on eyewitness accounts (which seems like the way it’s going to go) or government secrets (which also might be the direction they are headed).</li></ul><p>So, from my point of view, this is a team of people who call themselves experts but they haven’t done much, if any, scientific research, published papers, and undergone peer review for their work. Discovery producers can call them “experts” and won’t get in trouble for it. I’ll drop in here a reminder that Sanderson himself had a degree in Zoology. Calling oneself an “expert” is usual for paranormal content, so this flummery is almost expected. </p><p>If I’m wrong about any of these assertions, feel free to let me know. The reason I’m irked by this use of “expert” in a presumably zoological show is because, if you are going to do animal investigations regarding interpretation, conclusions, etc., that is framed as scientific, you had better have some legit cred and know how science actually works. None of these people have that, though it will not be obvious to the casual viewer. This is a <em>Monster Quest</em>-style show where people are pretending to do science and look very serious-minded, but their conclusions mean little because the results are contrived without peer review and critique. Scientific discoveries aren’t legitimized via TV show.</p><p>Oh dear, I’ve shown all my cards already. But it’s no surprise that I deeply despise this ‘I play a scientist/researcher on TV’ gambit. It is how many nonfiction mystery docu-shows are formatted, which is, unfortunately, promoting misinformation to the audience. My choice would have actual scientists talking about this stuff, but, I’d bet they are busy creating actual knowledge.</p><p>At least LMF does not appear to be manufactured fiction like previous Discovery Network shows. And, it is possible that the content <em>could</em> be informative. Plus, we all know that <em>Monster Quest</em> was useful in getting people interested in animals. Some of those people undoubtedly realized that the MQ content was not altogether reliable; that it was solely entertainment, not scholarship.</p><p><strong>Episode 1: A tale of two chupacabras</strong></p><p>I’ll hit the few points that stuck out to me in this episode.</p><p><strong>Sanderson is emphasized as “the” founder of cryptozoology.</strong></p><p>I’m going to assume that the people reading this have some background in the history of cryptozoology. The program uses Ivan T. Sanderson’s ideas as a foundation, and maybe nothing more than a plot device. I’m a bit concerned about that. Sanderson was problematic but I enjoy his writing without taking it too seriously. The narration tells us Sanderson was “the” founder of cryptozoology. The press release says “a” founder of cryptozoology, which is more correct. There is no mention of Bernard Heuvelmans (“father of cryptozoology”) so far, but they do head to Minnesota… </p><p><strong>Where is the archive from?</strong></p><p>The archive of recordings, papers, binders, casts and animal remains are said to have been “lost” for 50 years and that this team got access to it in Kalamazoo, Michigan. I don’t know the background for this. Sanderson’s paper are known to be in the archives of the American Philosophical Society in Philadelphia. I do not know the difference between the collections. Could this content be some of the material taken from his Society for the Investigation of the Unexplained (<em>SITU</em>) headquarters in New Jersey? It was known that after his death people made off with stuff from the headquarters. The origin story of the archives is not addressed in the first episode.</p><p><strong>Hybrid canids and the chupacabra</strong></p><p>For this episode, the link to Sanderson, who wrote back in the 1950s and 60s, is that he considered that hybrid wolf-like canids could account for mystery animals in the US. This is the show’s jumping off point to discuss livestock deaths by mystery canids in both North Carolina and Texas. Brittany, Troy and Justin visit farmers in Appalachian North Carolina who report seeing a large canid and experiencing livestock deaths. Notably, the creature is said to be bigger than a coyote with some reporting “glowing green eyes”.</p><p>Meanwhile, Charlie and Tracy pay a visit to Phyllis Canion, owner of the iconic “chupacabra” that was killed and taxidermied in Cuero, Texas. Canion’s DNA test showed that the strange animal was a coyote with a mix of Mexican red wolf. However, it is notable that the “wolf” portion could have been introduced generations ago, <a href="https://www.kens5.com/article/news/local/texas/uc-davis-team-says-chupacabra-is-likely-coyote-wolf-mix/273-413564189" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">according to information from UC Davis</a>. In LMF, however, the DNA result is said to include a “unknown” portion as well. Much is made of this “mystery” as I will circle back to in a bit.</p>Phyllis Canion with the mounted version of the hairless animal killed near her Cuero, Texas ranch. <p>In North Carolina, a stake out by the crew with a live goat as bait resulted in a brief glimpse on infrared video of a canid shape racing through the area. Almost unbelievably, the animal ran into a pole they placed in the ground to act as a hair trap, dislodging it. It left not hair, but skin. The skin sample was sent for DNA testing and the result was said to be exactly the same as Canion’s result, leading to the team to conclude that it’s the same species of animal.</p><p><strong>Blood-sucking beast</strong></p><p>The history of the cryptid called a “chupacabra” is socially complex and rather confusing. If you know, you know. Throughout the episode, the cast states that it would be awesome to finally get proof of whatever the “chupacabra” is. However, not only is Canion’s animal referred to as a “chupacabra” (so we already know that, in this four-legged chupa-form, it’s a coyote), but the legend of other sightings are assumed to be factual, as if this is all one-in-the-same “new” species of animal that “drains the blood” of livestock. At no point is there ever mention of the fact that canids do not and cannot “suck” blood. Dead animals don’t bleed because blood quickly coagulates. If the carcass is “mutilated” by scavengers after it is deceased, there will not be blood everywhere. The cast appears to be egregiously ignorant of how biology works. Or the whole vampire angle is emphasized for creepy effect.</p><p><strong>Ridiculous conclusion</strong></p><p>A trendy idea by non-scientists in the fantastical cryptid scene is that dire wolves are still living out there. There is <strong>zero</strong> scientific evidence for this, not even a hint that they exist, with the youngest remains dated at about 10,000 years ago. LMF suggests that the “unknown” portion of the two DNA results <em>could</em> represent dire wolf, vindicating Sanderson’s hybrid idea. However, we do have DNA from extinct dire wolfs and it shows they diverged from other wolf lines nearly 6 million years ago. The animals in question are not part dire wolf. The real conclusion, no matter if you believe or not, is that these animals are weird looking coyotes. Wolf-like canids readily hybridize. The DNA mix appears to not be unusual as it is common for southern coyotes to have red wolf DNA, but, here, the gaps are exploited as “mysterious” for dramatic effect (and as misinformation). </p><p>Barbieri and Mewshaw casually decide, on the basis of dubious reports and DNA conjecture, that both animals belong to a new species that they call “Lykos sphinx” – and inappropriate and nonsensical name. Zoological names must be based on specimens, and be published, not a hot take from a TV show. This is undoubtedly the stupidest part of the show, even outdoing the gross sibling jibes (which are sort of realistic and funny) and gratuitous sexist reference about Brittany asking to talk to other witnesses. </p><p>I’m not buying much of the “evidence” in this presentation. The premise of a blood sucking, green eyed, ravenous beast is supported. Coyotes, and many other things, kill livestock and there are several explanations for why a body remained uneaten. I’m not even convinced by the bite marks on the dead pig shown. Too many questions remain unanswered and the anecdotes are also unconvincing. LMF appears to be another in a very long parade of samey pseudoscience paranormal shows. The <a href="https://sharonahill.com/scientific-or-scientifical/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">scientifical</a> cast appears to want to use the gimmick that Sanderson was prescient in thinking about cryptids decades ago. I feel this is reaching, and it doesn’t land well. I will watch a few more episodes to see.</p><p><strong>Real mystery animal out there?</strong></p><p>I don’t want to end on that note – there is something interesting to me going on with animals like the one Phyllis Canion found and I would like to know more from actual experts. The Cuero specimen has some unique characteristics, and I wonder if more than one animal like this has been documented. In a way, these pseudo-chupacabra animals are cryptids in that the legend is growing and outpacing the ability of scientific information to reach the public. </p> <p>Sometimes called “Texas blue dogs” for their hairless, blue-skinned appearance, some show hairlessness beyond typical patterns of sarcoptic mange, and have unusual jaws, eye color, leg length, etc. I cannot find that there was ever a published article on these specimens, if they fall within the range of morphology for coyotes, and if this ties into the claims about these hybrid animals as a population or an anomaly. It would make an actual good show to hear more about this and see what’s real and what has been exaggerated. </p><p>For more info on the history of the chupacabra, check out Benjamin Radford’s <em><a href="https://moderncryptozoology.wordpress.com/2016/03/05/tracking-the-chupacabra-b-radford/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tracking the Chupacabra </a></em>(2011)</p><p>More: <a href="https://sharonahill.com/lost-monster-files-produces-some-abominable-research/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Episode 2, ABSM and the origin of the files</a> and <a href="https://sharonahill.com/lost-monster-files-thunderbird-episode-flies-in-the-face-of-reason/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Episode 3, Pennsylvania Thunderbird</a></p><p></p><p><a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/chupacabra/" target="_blank">#chupacabra</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/coyote/" target="_blank">#coyote</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/cryptid/" target="_blank">#cryptid</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/cryptozoology/" target="_blank">#Cryptozoology</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/dire-wolf/" target="_blank">#direWolf</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/dna/" target="_blank">#DNA</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/ivan-sanderson/" target="_blank">#IvanSanderson</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/lost-monster-files/" target="_blank">#LostMonsterFiles</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/monster-quest/" target="_blank">#MonsterQuest</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/paranormal-tv/" target="_blank">#paranormalTV</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/phyllis-canion/" target="_blank">#PhyllisCanion</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/review-of-lost-monster-files/" target="_blank">#ReviewOfLostMonsterFiles</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/science/" target="_blank">#science</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/sciencey/" target="_blank">#sciencey</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/scientifical/" target="_blank">#Scientifical</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/texas-blue-dogs/" target="_blank">#TexasBlueDogs</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://sharonahill.com/tag/tv-show/" target="_blank">#TVShow</a></p><p><a href="https://sharonahill.com/?p=8791" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">sharonahill.com/?p=8791</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p>
Tuckers Nuts Resist! 🇺🇦 <p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://lile.cl/@capibarabot" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>capibarabot</span></a></span> <br>🥥 Eye boost photos of Carpinchos, Capybaras, Chupacabras reflexively on the Fediverse. 🥥 <br><a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Carpincho" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Carpincho</span></a>, <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Capybara" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Capybara</span></a>, <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Chupacabra" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Chupacabra</span></a>, <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Mastodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Mastodon</span></a>, <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Boosting" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Boosting</span></a>, <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Fediverse" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Fediverse</span></a></p>
Tuckers Nuts Resist! 🇺🇦 <p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@CapybaraHourly" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>CapybaraHourly</span></a></span> <br>🥥 Eye boost photos of Carpinchos, Capybaras, Chupacabras indiscriminately on the Fediverse. 🥥 <br><a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Carpincho" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Carpincho</span></a>, <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Capybara" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Capybara</span></a>, <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Chupacabra" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Chupacabra</span></a>, <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Mastodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Mastodon</span></a>, <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Boosting" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Boosting</span></a>, <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Fediverse" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Fediverse</span></a></p>
ExploreLive feeds
Mastodon is the best way to keep up with what's happening.
Follow anyone across the fediverse and see it all in chronological order. No algorithms, ads, or clickbait in sight.
Create accountLoginDrag & drop to upload