Nonilex<p>Millet wrote that the text of the <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/Copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Copyright</span></a> Act of 1976, “taken as a whole, is best read as making humanity a necessary condition for authorship.” That <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/law" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>law</span></a> treats copyright as a heritable <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/property" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>property</span></a> right, suggesting an entity that can’t own property or have heirs can’t be an <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/author" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>author</span></a>. It also couches copyright terms to a <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/human" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>human</span></a> lifespan, she noted.</p><p><a href="https://masto.ai/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/IntellectualProperty" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>IntellectualProperty</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/ThalerVPerlmutter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ThalerVPerlmutter</span></a></p>