Coach Pāṇini ®<p>Via Dr. <a href="https://mastodon.world/tags/RichardClaydon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>RichardClaydon</span></a> on <a href="https://mastodon.world/tags/LinkedIn" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>LinkedIn</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.world/tags/Lobsters" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Lobsters</span></a> have been on my mind for a while.</p><p>Why?</p><p>They were employed by <a href="https://mastodon.world/tags/JordanPeterson" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>JordanPeterson</span></a> to support his argument that hierarchies were natural and not socially constructed, and that human males were in need of a discourse that didn't pathologise their behavioural tendencies.</p><p>I am interested in his use of the lobster as a metaphorical role-model for human males.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.world/tags/Lobsterdom" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Lobsterdom</span></a><br><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/drrichardclaydon_lobsters-yes-lobsters-theyve-been-on-activity-7307603937493229568-d-By?utm_source=share&amp;utm_medium=member_ios&amp;rcm=ACoAAACmWtEBurVmJxUdnv5QtGB6hgFTyYJNROs" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">linkedin.com/posts/drrichardcl</span><span class="invisible">aydon_lobsters-yes-lobsters-theyve-been-on-activity-7307603937493229568-d-By?utm_source=share&amp;utm_medium=member_ios&amp;rcm=ACoAAACmWtEBurVmJxUdnv5QtGB6hgFTyYJNROs</span></a></p><p>/1</p>