Ozzie D, NP-hard :bikepump: :vegan:<p>Cambridge Bike Safety sent a "Take Action" notice (which I got after I sent my own message to the city council), with a lot more detail, here reproduced:</p><blockquote><p>Hi Bike Friends,</p><p>In December, the Council asked to explore options for restoring two-way car traffic on Garden St while keeping separated bike lanes. Today, the City Manager will present four options detailed in this report (PDF download link: <a href="https://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=4&ID=23928&MeetingID=4647" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/</span><span class="invisible">FileOpen.aspx?Type=4&ID=23928&MeetingID=4647</span></a>). The council will likely discuss the trade-offs between Option 1, which maintains the current design and Options 2-4, which introduce two-way car traffic next to a bi-directional bike lane, for different lengths of Garden St.</p><p>Option 1 maintains a calmer Garden St with one-way traffic and is the least expensive. Please send an email to the Council in support of option #1.</p><p>Safety Issues with Options 2–4:</p><p>• Narrower bike lane buffers and removal of parking create dangerous intersections.<br>• Requires people biking to alternate between one-way and two-way bike lanes, at the same intersections with large volumes of turning vehicles.<br>• Increased crossing stress, risk, and delays for pedestrians.<br>• Overall traffic volumes would increase, heightening crash risks.<br>• Left-turn conflicts across the two-way bike lane are difficult to mitigate.<br>• Removes all parking and loading on Garden St in the areas which have two-way car traffic, which could lead to blocked bike lanes.</p><p>Here’s what you should know:</p><p>The current design (Option #1) is safer for pedestrians and cyclists. There has been a substantial reduction in crashes involving a pedestrian or cyclist since this project was implemented. The transportation department concluded (<a href="https://www.cambridgema.gov/-/media/Files/Traffic/2022/gardenst/postinstallationdata/033023gardenstreetsafetyimprovementprojcetlocaltrafficanalysis.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">cambridgema.gov/-/media/Files/</span><span class="invisible">Traffic/2022/gardenst/postinstallationdata/033023gardenstreetsafetyimprovementprojcetlocaltrafficanalysis.pdf</span></a>) that restoring two-way car traffic would "likely reduce comfort and safety for people biking and walking", increase travel times for everyone, and introduce more potential conflicts. View more safety details at the bottom of this email.</p><p>This isn’t how street design should be done. The City Council should set policy goals, not micromanage individual street layouts. That’s what the City’s professional transportation staff and engineers are trained to do.</p><p>An extensive community process led to this compromise. A year-long public process (<a href="https://www.cambridgema.gov/StreetsAndTransportation/ProjectsAndPrograms/GardenStSafetyImprovementProject" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">cambridgema.gov/StreetsAndTran</span><span class="invisible">sportation/ProjectsAndPrograms/GardenStSafetyImprovementProject</span></a>) with four well-attended public meetings in 2022 led to the city implementing this new design, which was requested by the community. Any new process should build on, not ignore the input of the neighborhood, and should meaningfully engage the community without a predefined conclusion.</p><p>It could delay critical safety work elsewhere. Option #4 would require a community engagement process, transportation design process, and additional street implementation work. This could delay work on safety projects on other much more dangerous streets—including Mass Ave, Broadway, Main Street, and Cambridge Street. Any public process and design changes to Garden St should be prioritized after projects on streets that do not currently have protection.</p><p>It sets a dangerous precedent. If the Council overrides expert recommendations and analysis and relitigates completed infrastructure projects, it opens the door to political fights over every street redesign in the city.</p><p>The City is facing serious budget pressure. Completing this project will require additional staff time, costs for advertising community meetings (e.g. postcards and signs), professional design work from a transportation firm, and larger physical changes to the street. This could result in diverting investment from more dangerous roads, and will spend tax dollars on redoing a recently completed project.</p><p>Take Action</p><p>Please send an email to the Council: email council@cambridgema.gov, and CC cityclerk@cambridgema.gov and info@cambridgebikesafety.org).</p><p>Let the Council know that you support keeping Garden St safer and more comfortable, via option #1. You can speak to your personal experience—how the current design has made you feel safer, how it's improved your commute, or any of the points listed above that resonate with you.</p><p>Thank you for taking the time to make your voice heard. Together, we can ensure our streets remain safe and welcoming.</p><p>Warm Regards,<br>Cambridge Bicycle Safety</p></blockquote><p><a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/CambridgeMA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CambridgeMA</span></a></p>